Why Liberals and Libertarians Both Have It Wrong — And Right

Liberals say that rising income inequality is hurting economic growth. Libertarians say that government regulation is to blame. Who’s right?

Both, say Steven Teles and Brink Lindsey, who visited Stanford Graduate School of Business recently as part of its Corporations and Society Initiative. Teles, a left-leaning professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University, and Lindsey, a libertarian-leaning researcher at the Washington, D.C., think tank Niskanen Center, coauthored The Captured Economy: How the Powerful Enrich Themselves, Slow Down Growth, and Increase Inequality. The authors critique laws and regulations that they believe result from poor policymaking practices and ultimately suppress economic growth and hurt the public.

While the two authors ask conservatives to recognize that income inequality threatens growth, they also show liberals that government regulation, if misguided or badly constructed, can do more harm than good by increasing inequality.

Those regulations aren’t necessarily the work of incompetent or ill-intended people but rather the result of faulty processes, they say. “If we have bad processes, we get bad policies,” Lindsey says.

States, for instance, create licensing boards for certain fields, ranging from medicine to hairdressing, that regulate who can join the occupation and what qualifications and training are needed. But under current processes, states allow those licensing boards to be controlled by industry insiders and incumbents who set high barriers to entering the field.

Those barriers, such as requiring a minimum number of hours of sometimes expensive training, constrain the supply of people in a given field and thereby artificially boost the incomes of the incumbents and increase inequality, Teles and Lindsey say. Occupations requiring a license are often a ticket into the middle class, so making it costly for low-income individuals to enter a licensed trade exacerbates income inequality even further.

If we can’t get back to inclusive prosperity, that calls into significant question how much integrity liberal democracy will be able to retain going forward. The stakes are high.
Brink Lindsey

With licensing laws reducing competition, raising prices, and misallocating income, the economy doesn’t grow as fast as it could, the authors contend. Licensing rules also encourage incumbents to stick with old practices instead of considering new ways of doing business that can boost economic activity. The licensed taxicab industry, for instance, didn’t accept electronic payments until it faced competition from new ridesharing services, the authors write.

The authors also cite the “insidious phenomenon” of regulatory capture, in which corporations gain so much power over elected officials and legislative bodies that they essentially write the rules that govern their industries. This in turn creates a playing field stripped of the competition that libertarians regard as the engine of successful capitalism. “The U.S. economy has become less open to competition and more clogged by insider-protecting deals than it was just a few decades ago,” they write. “In real and consequential ways, the economic game has been rigged in favor of people at the top.”

Lindsey and Teles suggest a hybrid of solutions that they call “liberaltarian.” Changing when and where laws are made might help prevent small numbers of individuals from having disproportionate influence, the authors suggest. As it is now, hearings and meetings often occur at awkward and inconvenient times and places, making them likely to attract only vested insiders whose voice becomes magnified. Moving the venue or shifting the decision-making from, say, the local level to a state or regional level could encourage more people to take part and improve the process.

Encouraging lawmakers’ staffers to sharpen their knowledge of the issues they oversee would also help. Staffers frequently don’t have the expertise to evaluate complicated or highly technical areas, so they’re more likely to be swayed or misled by a lobbyist’s self-serving argument, the authors say. Increasing the pay and training of legislative underlings would make them better equipped to thwart unethical lobbying efforts.

Doing nothing to address economic inequality and malaise has more than just material consequences for individuals, says Lindsey. “Modern economic growth and modern democracy co-evolved,” he says. “If we can’t get back to inclusive prosperity, that calls into significant question how much integrity liberal democracy will be able to retain going forward. The stakes are high.

This piece was originally published by Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Job opportunity!

Human Rights Watch is seeking a Researcher and Advocate on Digital Rights to investigate, analyze, and advocate against human rights abuses related to online activities. The role of the Researcher and Advocate will include documenting and conveying the...

What Star Trek got Right and Wrong about Books

What Star Trek got Right and Wrong about Books

When you have to many booksLiving in a Silicon Valley cottage it became clear that something was going to have to go.  Unfortunately for me that meant that my wife’s and my rather large collection of books was on the chopping block.  So one weekend we took...

X-Files: The Deep State

Celebrating the 25th anniversary of the X-Files(!) 21st Century Fox's game division FoxNext Games is about to release "The X-Files: Deep State".  A role playing mystery/SF game that will transport you into the world of the FBI's paranormal investigators. ...

Koenig On Modern Star Trek

The original series’ Walter Koenig recently shared his opinion on modern Star Trek, including the three recent movies and Star Trek: Discovery.... Check it out: Koenig On Modern Star Trek

Good news everybody!

Good news everybody!

Good news everybody, Matt Groening is giving us the first new Futurama content in years! Bad news, it will be a mobile game. Let's just hope it is better then the Simpson's games! Still, I'm sure it will be worth checking out when it is released (hopefully) later this...

Get me to Alpha Centauri!

I want my anti-matter!  It’s hard to make, hard to store, expensive and volatile.  But damn it, I want some!  “If you had some,” you might ask, “what would you do with it?”  Really? Do you have to ask?  I would use it for fuel to get me to Alpha Centauri. Or perhaps...

The Raven-

It is often a fine line between SF and horror, finer still as we approach Halloween!  In the spirit of the holiday here is a tidbit for your pleasure!   https://youtu.be/BefliMlEzZ8  

The Future of A.I. will be live streamed

The Future of A.I. will be live streamed

As part of Pres. Obama's Global Entrepreneurship summit Stanford University will be hosting a conference on the future of Artificial Intelligence. This is an example of the acceleration of a trend we have seen in recent years in which the focus of A.I. has been...

Best Political Song Ever?

Best Political Song Ever?

Won't Get Fooled Again by The Who's Pete Townshend We'll be fighting in the streets With our children at our feet And the morals that they worship will be gone And the men who spurred us on Sit in judgement of all wrong They decide and the shotgun sings the song I'll...

Science Fiction

Internet Speculative Fiction Database

Science Fiction Encyclopedia

Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America

Science Fiction Spaceships

Science Fiction Studies

Speculative Fiction Tropes

Starship Dimenssions

TelevisionTunes.com

Tor.com

Franchises

Star Trek

startrek.com

Ex Astris Scientia

trekcore

Daystrom Institute

Trekspertise

trekmovie.com

Memory Alpha

Trek Today

Star Wars

starwars.com

swnn

Star Gate

Gate World

Stargate Command

Babylon 5

Lurkers Guide to Babylon 5

Authors

Issac Asimov

David Brin

Charlie’s Diary

Philip K. Dick

Kim Stanley Robinson

 

Politics and Political Science

Current Events

Key L=left   R=Right  M=moderate

S=Socialist   Libe=libertarian

 

alternet (L)

The American Prospect (L)

The American Spectator (R)

BHL (libe)

crooks and liars (L)

Dissent (L)

The Economist (M)

FiveThirtyEight (M)

The Hill (R)

Jacobin (S)

Jobs with Justice (L)

Maclean’s (M)

The Moderate Voice (M)

Mother Jones (L)

Monthly Review (S)

The Nation (L)

The National Review (R)

The New American (R)

The New Statesman (L)

The New Republic (L)

People for the American Way (L)

Politics1 (M)

Politico (M)

ProPublica (M)

reason (Libe)

ThinkProgress (L)

Tikkun (L)

The Washington Free Beacon (R)

The Weekly Standard (R)

The XX Committee (R)

 

Non-Partisan

 

FactCheck.org

GovTrack

MapLight

National Popular Vote

On The Issues

Sunlight Foundation

 

Political Science

APSA

The Avalon Project

Brookins (L)

The Hamilton Project

Hoover Institution (R)

Political Science Rumors

RangeVoting.org

Economics

Washington Center for Equitable Growth

History

Ancient History Encyclopedia

Philosophy

Leiter Reports

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Society

The Atlantic

salon

Slate

 

Religion

Adherents.com

America’s Public Bible

Auburn

Bible Hub

Pangea blog

Patheos

Sacred Text Archive

Skeptic’s Annotated Bible

 

Humanities

In the Middle

 

Literature and Media

Goodreads

New Books network

Overthinking It

Purdue Online Writing Lab

 

Physical Science and Technology

ars techmica

Big Picture Science

Centauri Dreams

future of life institute

ITPro Today

KrebsonSecurity

MacRumors

PC Mag

Preposterous Universe

Quanta magazine

Slashdot

tom’s HARDWARE