American Gothic Literature, a new kind of horror story
A Review of “American Gothic Literature”
Ruth Bienstock Anolik, 2019, McFarland & Company Inc. 306 pages
Like the genre it examines, this work is insightful, inspiring, exhilarating, and challenging. However, it is not for the faint of heart! A somewhat exhaustive look at the history and current state of American Gothic literature, Ruth Bienstock Anolik takes the reader on a tour of not just a uniquely American literature, but of the emergence of an American identity derived from its Old World beginnings.
Unlike many other mainstream works it has an emphasis on the marginalized and powerless peoples of America that is uncommon. While it does not attempt to allow these peoples to speak for themselves, as might expect of a work of a literary history, it does effectively revel many stories through an examination of academic works. While this might sound dry the author makes excellent use of broad overarching themes contrasted with small details that draw the readers’ attention. For example, the work effectively moves between examinations of 17th and 18th century European folk tales and modern American Gothic/Science Fiction novels to point out “hidden” themes of feminism, alienation, oppression and dispossession that might otherwise be lost to readers of both types of literature. In this way the author links such disparate works as Toni Morrison’s “Beloved” with Horace Walpole’s “The Castle of Otranto” and “He, She and It” by Marge Piercy to show how they inhabit a shared space and each contributes to American Literature in unexpected ways. Gothic tropes are examined, placed in context to their world and re-examined to show how they contribute to the understanding of our (modern American) world.
American Gothic’s central theme is that Gothic literature, although confined to it’s own tropes is also very flexible, further, America has produced it’s own version of Gothic literature. This version grew out of the English and American writers who have dealt with this situation since the birth of our country. “American writers are haunted by feelings of inadequacy, and of guilt, as American literature finds itself haunted by the looming ghost of its predecessor, English literature.”1 In spite of this, American Gothic has evolved to become a mature literature that is used to explore American issues. As Ms. Anolik points out, while examining an American classic Uncle Tom’s Cabin:
“in Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin, the slave Cassy takes possession of herself by appropriating the Gothic narrative; in materializing Legreee’s fears, Cassy is able to make her escape and repossess her body from the bonds of chattel slavery. These examples illustrate the uses of the Gothic for the disposed and insecure American writer.”2
Ruth Anolik is not afraid of drawing conclusions from her source material, this is more of an essay meant to persuade us of a point of view than a history textbook. Her conclusions are logical and placed within the context of what she examines, and they are likely to surprise some people. They range from the subtle and somewhat obscure; for example, she points out the association of the feminine with the dybbuk and the masculine with the golem, to the more controversial association of Vampires and Zombies to the modern American aristocrat. Her language is for the most part value-free; she relies on the example she chooses and the writers examined words to help her make her points. Even though much attention is devoted to issues of marginalization and feminism social commentary is subtle and can be easily missed if the reader does not pay attention. All-in-all, this is a well-researched work with valuable insights. This work is highly recommended to those who are interested in American Literature or the Gothic in general.
1 P. 10
2 P. 272
The Good
Interesting thesis
Well researched
The Bad
Occasionally gets lost in the details
Sometimes difficult to follow
#ShutDownAcademia
Via #Shutdownstem
On June 10, 2020, we will #ShutDownAcademia, #ShutDownSTEM, and #Strike4BlackLives.
In the wake of the most recent murders of Black people in the US, it is clear that white and other non-Black people have to step up and do the work to eradicate anti-Black racism. As members of the global academic and STEM communities, we have an enormous ethical obligation to stop doing “business as usual.” No matter where we physically live, we impact and are impacted by this moment in history.
Our responsibility starts with our role in society. In academia, our thoughts and words turn into new ways of knowing. Our research papers turn into media releases, books and legislation that reinforce anti-Black narratives. In STEM, we create technologies that affect every part of our society and are routinely weaponized against Black people.
Black academic and Black STEM professionals are hurting because they exist in and are attacked by institutional and systemic racism. Black people have been tirelessly working for change, alongside their Indigenous and People of Color allies. For Black academics and STEM professionals, #ShutDownAcademia and #ShutDownSTEM is a time to prioritize their needs— whether that is to rest, reflect, or to act— without incurring additional cumulative disadvantage.
Those of us who are not Black, particularly those of us who are white, play a key role in perpetuating systemic racism. Direct actions are needed to stop this injustice. Unless you engage directly with eliminating racism, you are perpetuating it. This moment calls for profound and meaningful change. #ShutDownAcademia and #ShutDownSTEM is the time for white and non-Black People of Color (NBPOC) to not only educate themselves, but to define a detailed plan of action to carry forward. Wednesday June 10, 2020 will mark the day that we transition into a lifelong commitment of actions to eradicate anti-Black racism in academia and STEM. We join with members of Particles for Justice in calling for a #Strike4BlackLives.
To be clear: #ShutDownSTEM is aimed at the broad research community who is not directly participating in ending the global pandemic, COVID-19. If your daily activities are directly helping us end this global crisis, we send our sincerest gratitude. The rest of us, we need to get to work.
Share your detailed plans and actions with the global community using the hashtags #ShutDownSTEM and #ShutDownAcademia.
Our collective efforts will lead to eradicating anti-Black racism because Black lives depend on it.
Amusing Ourselves to Death by Dr. Neil Postman, a Short Book Review
Why should we care about 1970’s Television?
Neil Postman’s Amusing Ourselves to Death is one of many works from the latter half of the 20th Century which bemoans what he calls the “Age of Show Business,” or what other people have called the culture of television. Why should we care about this today? The general argument of these books is that TV is intentionally shallow and vapid, playing to the lowest common denominator of it’s audience, therefore everyone who watches television will be shallow and vapid. Although similar in arguments to many of these types of works Dr. Postman’s unique contribution is that he makes a striking political argument about the interaction of television and our political will. Why is this work important in an age when television is becoming less and less the center of our culture? Why does this work stand out from all the others of it’s ilk? It is because Dr. Postman tries to convince us that our culture (that is to say our entertainment) determines our political behavior and robs us of our free will! Interestingly he wraps his arguments around a sort of prophetic competition between George Orwell’s 1984 and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World which lends a sense of depth to his work. This also allows him to use literature (which he views as vastly superior) to criticize TV.
Almost the entire first half of this work is a defense of literature in which he provides his rational for why literature is vastly superior to television (and by extension more modern forms of video media that are accessed via the internet). Or as he says “I am not making a case for epistemological relativism. Some ways of truth-telling are better than others, and therefore have a healthier influence on the cultures that adopt them. Indeed, I hope to persuade you that the decline of a print-based epistemology and the accompanying rise of a television-based epistemology has had grave consequences for public life, that we are getting sillier by the minute.” Literature, or as he often calls it “typography” produces a sophisticated consumer of information because it forces the user to be an active participant while television is an “idiot’s delight” because it asks nothing but passivity from it’s users. These are common arguments that can be found in many works of the time, for example see Jerry Mander’s “Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television” among others.
The real value of this work lies in the second half in which Dr. Postman gives us the meat of his argument, that “in the Age of Television we have less to fear from government restraints than from television glut; that, in fact, we have no way of protecting ourselves from information disseminated by corporate America; and that, therefore, the battles for liberty must be fought on different terrains from where they once were.”[1] This is not some nefarious plot to take power, simply a function of how television as big business works. While in the past America’s political culture consisted of reading Thomas Pains “Common Sense” or reading a transcript of the 1850’s Lincoln-Douglas debates today Americans watch 30 second political commercials. But where others criticize this as the “dumbing down” of America Dr. Postman goes a step further and sees this as a new “ideology”. In the “Age of Show Business” for the average person the very structure of political arguments have changed, they are visual, emotional, commercial and shallow. Citizens are controlled by the arguments because they are passive consumers rather than active participants. It is an “unintended consequence of a dramatic change in our modes of public conversation, But is an ideology nonetheless, for it imposes a way of life, a set of relations among people and ideas, about which there has been no consensus, no discussion and no opposition. Only compliance.” This is not Marshall McLuhan’s the medium is the message, this is the concept that the message is controlled by the type of media that delivers it. Not just the ideas, but the texture, the emotions and the ways of expressing arguments. Dr. Postman is not worried about Orwellian Newspeak because he does not see a malevolent force controlling the people, but rather a Huxleyan dystopia in which people have ceded their intellect to the mode of the media. I say “mode” rather than “control” because his point is not that people’s ideas are being controlled as you might think would happen in an authoritarian regime, but that the texture of peoples ideas follows the pattern set forth by the media. Since this pattern is inferior to what preceded it, so will our culture be inferior to what preceded us.
It has been 35 years since the first edition of this book, but it is more important than ever. Though the internet was in it’s infancy and YouTube did not exist when this was written the pattern of visual media was being established by television. Though their are many differences between then and now few have explored the effect of media on consumers in the way that this work does. It is subtle though not understated, it warns us that we must pay attention to the ways that we consume our media if we do not want to be consumed by our media.
———-[1] Chapter 9 Reach Out and Elect Someone
The Good
The writing is clear and direct, he uses phrase such as “The point is” and “I mean to say”.
Ideas are placed in context which provides helpful background information.
His passion for the topic show through.
The Bad
This is more of an exposition than an academic work so he provides no chain of logic to build his arguments.
He has a strong religious bias which might turn some people off.
How I Passed My U.S. Citizenship Test: By Keeping the Right Answers to Myself
by Dafna Linzer ProPublica, Feb. 23, 2011, 4:31 p.m. This story was co-published with Slate. Last month, I became an American citizen, a tremendous honor and no easy accomplishment, even for a Canadian. After living here for 12 years, I thought I knew everything. Then...
40 years ago, we left the moon
I'm on the surface; and, as I take man's last step from the surface, back home for some time to come—but we believe not too long into the future—I'd like to just (say) what I believe history will record. That America's challenge of today has forged man's destiny of...
Let’s Teach Actual Science
"By teaching our kids actual science, we can guarantee the future of this country and its economic growth. By hiding it from them, by equivocating about it with them, by providing false balance between reality and wishful thinking, what we guarantee is a future...
Fun with Polls
To many people think politics is boring, yet nothing gets their attention like finding out how much money a candidate will be worth to them. Can you say "economic stimulus"? If that's to esoteric how about "tax refund"? Or perhaps finding out who agrees (or...
Robot Hall of Fame is Looking for your Vote
The Robot Hall of Fame ("powered by Carnegie Mellon" University) is asking the public to help pick the winners from it's 2012 induction class. The contestants are divided into Education and Consumer, Industrial and Service, Research and of course Entertainment...
Ray Bradbury Has Past On
In honor of Ray Bradbury who past on today June 6th 2012, here is my favorite Ray Bradbury quote: "Any owner of cats will know of what I speak. Cats come at dawn to sit on your bed. They may not nip your nose or inhale your breath or make a sound. They simply sit...
Capitalist Development and Democracy, Great Ideas but a Difficult Read
Capitalist Development and Democracy. Rueschemyer, Dietrich and Evelyne Huber Stephens and John D. Stephens. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1992. 387 pages. Capitalist Development and Democracy by Rueschmyer, Stephans and Stephans is an ambitious work which...
Science Fiction
Chronicles (SF&F forum)
Historical Dictionary of Science Fiction
Internet Speculative Fiction Database
Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America
Franchises
Star Trek
Star Wars
Star Gate
Babylon 5
Authors
Politics and Political Science
Current Events
Key L=left R=Right M=moderate
S=Socialist Libe=libertarian
alternet (L)
BHL (libe)
crooks and liars (L)
Dissent (L)
The Economist (M)
FiveThirtyEight (M)
The Hill (R)
Institute for Humane Studies (M)
Jacobin (S)
Learn Liberty (Libe)
Liberty Explained (Libe)
Maclean’s (M)
Mother Jones (L)
Monthly Review (S)
The Nation (L)
The New American (R)
The New Republic (L)
People for the American Way (L)
Politics1 (M)
Politico (M)
ProPublica (M)
reason (Libe)
The Washington Free Beacon (R)
Non-Partisan
Political Science
Brookins (L)
Cato Institute Libe
Democrats.org (L)
GOP (R)
Law and Liberty (R)
Libertarian Party (Libe)
Political Theorists
General News
Research Tools
SOC ARXIV (social science oriented preprint server)
Stork (automated journal search)
Economics
AEI (R)
Washington Center for Equitable Growth (L)
History and Geography
A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry
House Divided (Civil War Research Engine)
Philosophy
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Society
Religion
Public Religion Research Institute
Humanities
Literature and Media
Physical Science and Technology